Banking Exchange Magazine Logo

Avoid this M&A roadblock now

Deferred comp issues can complicate a deal. Fix them up front

Your bank shouldn't first learn of deferred comp problems in the midst of negotiations. Your bank shouldn't first learn of deferred comp problems in the midst of negotiations.

We have had a couple recent issues arise in our community bank acquisition practice that need to be addressed, or at least reviewed, by all community banks, particularly those who use any kind of deferred compensation for their directors or officers.

Deferred compensation agreements allow directors to defer their board compensation that is currently payable, to some subsequent point in time at which they are entitled to receive it. Many of these agreements were created years ago. The time to address the issues is before you get into a deal process.

Complying with IRS 409A

The significant intervening factor with respect to all deferred compensation agreements is the implementation of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, passed by Congress over a decade ago.

IRS Code Section 409A is complicated, to say the least. The bottom line, however, is that if the deferred compensation plan fails to comply with Section 409A, the deferrals are included in income when vested and are subject to a 20% penalty tax paid by the participants in the plan. In some cases, an underpayment interest penalty may also apply.

Because of these draconian issues, my recommendation is all deferred compensation agreements, particularly those for directors that may have been implemented some time ago, be reviewed for Section 409A issues.

What to consider relating to a deal

Unfortunately, there is no specific format for an agreement with respect to a plan that is subject to Section 409A except that it be documented. There are, however, certain minimum provisions that should be included.

Some of these provisions, some of which are optional, include the following:

1. Definitions with respect to distribution events, such as separation from service, disability, change in control, unforeseeable emergency, and leave of absence.

2. A provision for designated payment dates or payment dates measured from the separation date, such as 90 days after separation.

3. An optional provision for cash-outs of small distributions.

4. An optional provision for the limited available offset of the employee’s obligations to the employer against the amounts due to the employee under the plan.

5. Optional provisions stating other desired exceptions to the prohibition against benefit accelerations, such as distribution of benefits (i) pursuant to a domestic relations order incident to a divorce or legal separation; (ii) to pay FICA taxes due on compensation deferred under the plan and any associated income taxes; or (iii) to pay taxes due on breach of Section 409A.

6. A provision for voluntary plan termination by the employer.

7. A provision for interpretation of all terms and provisions consistent with Section 409A, especially regarding all undefined, ambiguous, or incomplete definitions and provisions.

8. A provision under which the employer either disclaims or accepts responsibility for any adverse tax consequences arising under Section 409A.

9. A spendthrift or non-assignability provision.

10. A provision that the plan benefit is an unsecured and unfunded contractual promise to pay plan, rather than a funded plan.

11. Provisions designed to comply with state law employment requirements and choice of law.

12. An optional provision allowing for subsequent elections changing the previously designated form from time of payment, including a provision for treating a prior election in installments as a unitary single election or a series of individual elections for this purpose.

13. A provision for a reasonable rate of return or an objective measure for the rate of return, such as a stock or bond index, if a rate of return on the account balance is in the Agreement.

14. A provision stating the date by which elections to defer base pay, bonuses and performance-based pay must be specified, both for existing participants and those who become eligible after the beginning of a year.

15. A provision for automatic cancellation of a participant’s deferrals upon the participant’s receipt of a hardship distribution, if hardship distributions are provided for.

16. A provision for application of all terms and provisions consistent with 409A, especially as to all undefined, ambiguous, or incomplete definitions and provisions, is not required—but it is permissible and useful.

Act now to prevent later problems

As you will note from the above “laundry list,” 409A is a complex area. Unfortunately, in some of the recent community bank acquisitions we have participated in, 409A violation issues or failure to comply issues had become paramount, primarily because of their impact on the human beings involved.

Just a word of warning to the wise: Review your deferred compensation agreements, both for directors and executives, to make sure they are 409A compliant. It will save you a lot of trouble in the long run. It is much easier to get these issues addressed on the front end than it is on the back end when you are in the throes of trying to get a deal put together.

Jeff Gerrish

Jeff Gerrish is chairman of the board of Gerrish Smith Tuck Consultants, LLC, and a member of the Memphis-based law firm of Gerrish Smith Tuck, PC, Attorneys. He frequently contributes to Banking Exchange and frequently speaks at industry events.

In mid-2016 Gerrish's blog received a national bronze excellence award from the American Society of Business Publication Editors. This followed his receipt of the regional silver excellence award for the Northeastern Region from the same group.

Gerrish formerly served as regional counsel for the FDIC’s Memphis regional office and with the FDIC in Washington, D.C., where he had nationwide responsibility for litigation against directors of failed banks. Since the firm’s formation in 1988, Gerrish Smith Tuck has assisted over 2,000 community banks in all 50 states across the nation with matters such as strategic planning, mergers and acquisitions, common stock private placements, holding company formation and reorganization, and a wide variety of regulatory matters. Jeff Gerrish can be contacted at [email protected].

back to top


About Us

Connect With Us



Banking Exchange Interview with
Rachel Lewis of Stock Yards Bank

As part of the Banking Exchange Interview Series we and SkyStem are proud to present our interview with Rachel Lewis, Assistant Controller at Stock Yards Bank & Trust.

In this interview, Banking Exchange's Publisher Erik Vander Kolk, speaks with Rachel Lewis at length. We get a brief overview of her professional journey in the banking industry and get insights into what role technology plays in helping her do her work.


This Executive Interview is brought to you by:
SkyStem logo