Menu
Banking Exchange Magazine Logo
Menu

“Mercy Mercy Me”*

“Things ain’t what they used to be”—or are they?

Reviewing BSA after 30 years: BE blogger John Byrne was among experts testifying this week before a joint hearing of the Terrorism and Illicit Finance Subcommittee and Financial   Institutions and Consumer Credit Subcommittee. The subject was “Legislative Proposals to Counter Terrorism and Illicit Finance.” Reviewing BSA after 30 years: BE blogger John Byrne was among experts testifying this week before a joint hearing of the Terrorism and Illicit Finance Subcommittee and Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit Subcommittee. The subject was “Legislative Proposals to Counter Terrorism and Illicit Finance.”

This week I had the opportunity to return to Capitol Hill and testify on the Bank Secrecy Act, for the first time in 14 years.

Clearly some things have changed—better technology in the hearing rooms and I didn’t have to send a messenger up with 50 paper copies of testimony.

Some things have not changed—members still have five minutes to ask questions or just to make a point. Clearly some were well-versed in the nuances of AML but many were not. (To be fair, with all of the many issues a member needs to follow, this is hardly surprising.)

Also, while all of us witnesses submitted lengthy testimony, we too only had five minutes to summarize key points and then respond to questions.

One never knows what resonates with members but I certainly hope they heard my one loud call—you cannot effectively address this area without consulting all stakeholders!

BSA/AML has decades of history

The hearing concerned several proposals, but the main one was a fairly comprehensive attempt to dramatically change elements of reporting and information sharing as well as addressing the ongoing beneficial ownership conundrum.

I was going to name this post “Wonderful World,” after the Sam Cooke song (“What a wonderful world this would be…”) with the key line being “don’t know much about history,” because the proposals to raise the CTR thresholds and to consider one form for both CTRS and SARs actually have a history.

For those of us veterans in AML we remember the early filings of CTRs with a suspicious transaction box that was woefully inadequate and led to SARs.

There is a written record of this, I swear.

Want more banking news and analysis?

Get banking news, insights and solutions delivered to your inbox each week.

I certainly battled to raise the CTR thresholds in the late 90s and in the last decade, but law enforcement made clear they would lose data (how valuable I leave to others to discern).

In 2017 the vast majority of banks of all sizes have automated systems that make raising the reporting requirements not so much of a burden reduction. A fellow witness claimed value in increasing the threshold but did admit that more needed to be done around reporting. For example, I pointed to regulatory criticism of exemption use as a bigger issue and he did not dispute that.

The problem for the broader audience of AML neophytes is that some members wanted to raise the threshold to $60,000 (!) while others correctly pointed out how much cash could be deposited in a day or week without detection at that level.

There clearly needs to be more research on what was said before, coupled with the prism of new technology, if we are going to address the volume of CTRs that simply take up space.

I offered a different approach after speaking to a number of industry colleagues—eliminate all CTRS and have financial institutions send cash transactions directly to FinCEN at whatever amount law enforcement and policy makers decide. With this proverbial “data dump” it would be much easier to determine value and the unfair criticisms by regulators on inadvertent late filings and other administrative penalties would go away.

Unfortunately I did not get any questions on this, but I will keep trying.

Remember why we are doing all this

The other parts of the hearing that surprised me was the lack of focus on how regulatory oversight impacts AML and takes it away from the core mission of reporting, detection, and prevention of the movement of illicit funds.

Also, in my opinion, when witnesses claim the entire AML regime is broken, they lose credibility.

While hyperbole is all the rage these days (to say the least) a review of 30 years of AML deserves reason, debate, and facts. The staffs on both sides of the aisle appear committed to that seriousness of purpose, so impacted AML entities need to respect that and not simply make over-the-top statements on burden.

If you do not believe you have a role in AML in 2017 you should not be at the table. Fortunately I feel most do.

There are many other issues from the hearing that I will continue to cover and discuss, such as how can anyone not believe we need some coverage on beneficial ownership information gathering?

Also, there’s the notion that broader information sharing between banks will somehow adversely affect privacy. Frankly, this claim baffles me. The fact that people believe this points to the need for more communication.

Finally, in the past AML issues were bipartisan and that still seems sort of true today, but there is much more skepticism about government than ever before.

Let’s stay engaged in this important debate to improve AML and listen to everyone—before making any changes.

* “Mercy Mercy Me” or the Ecology song was penned by Marvin Gaye in 1971 and was a warning about the environment. Still a challenge…

You can read written testimony and view the entire hearing John Byrne testified at on the House Financial Services Committee website.

John Byrne

John Byrne is President of Condor Consulting LLC and Senior Advisor to the Advisory Board  of the Association of Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists. ACAMS, with more than 55,000 members, develops anti-money laundering/sanctions/financial crime detection programs and certifies specialists in financial and non-financial businesses and government agencies. Byrne is a nationally known regulatory and legislative attorney with close to 30 years of experience in a vast array of financial services issues, with particular expertise in all aspects of regulatory oversight, policy and management, anti-money laundering (AML), privacy, and consumer compliance. He has written hundreds of articles on AML; represented the banking industry in this area before Congress, state legislatures, and international bodies such as the Financial Action Task Force (FATF); and appeared on CNN, Good Morning America, the Today Show, and many other media outlets. Byrne has received a number of awards, including the Director's Medal for Exceptional Service from the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and the ABA's Distinguished Service Award for his career work in the compliance field. His podcast, “AML Now” (on ITunes) received a 2017 Communicator Award for hosting from the Academy of Interactive and Visual Arts. Byrne’s blog on AML and Fraud on BankingExchange.com received a Gold Hermes Award in 2016. John received the ACAMS Lifetime Service Award in September. Byrne can be e-mailed at john.byrne90@yahoo.com and don't miss John's updates on Twitter! You can find him at @jbacams2011

More in this category: « “With or Without You”*
back to top

Sections

About Us

Connect With Us

Resources